Litigation of khula or Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:
For the litigation of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan Nazia Law Associates is the best law firm in Lahore. Entrustment of all cases to the same Court; otherwise, it was also conducive to effectual adjudication of causes between parties and would also cause minor inconvenience. Cases filed by husband against wife in Courts at place "G.K." were transferred to place Where the wife was pending adjudication against her husband. The convenience of lady Suits for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan.
Conjugal Rights:
and restitution of conjugal rights between same parties to be tried by one and same Court to avoid conflict of judgments-Filing of suit by husband for a refund of conjugal rights earlier in time, held, not an impediment in the way of transfer of his case where wife filed a lawsuit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan subsequently-Due consideration to be given to the convenience of lady litigant." Copy of Nikahnanma placed on record clearly showed that parties were married at place N. the place and transferred same to Court at site 'N where same would be heard and decided along with suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed the respondent-husband irrespective of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan.
Guardian Matters:
Court's competent to entertain guardian matters. Notifications issued by High Court in terms of S.4-A (1), Guardians and wards Act, 1890 and under High Court Rules and Orders. Combined effect. High Court had authorized District Judges to transfer proceedings under Guardians and wards Act, 1890 to Civil Judges. First Class could not nominate Civil Judge at sub-divisional level or otherwise to act as Guardian Judges. District Judge had no such powers, which High Court had under S.25-A of West Pakistan family court's Act, 1964 to transfer any case from one family court to another family court in the same District or other District.
Khula Procedure in Pakistan:
District Judge for the case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan should have either returned such application to the respondent for want of jurisdiction or referred the matter to High Court after calling comments from the concerned family court. District Judge had not adopted such two courses but had misused his administrative powers by circumventing specific provisions of S.25-A of West Pakistan family court's Act, 1964. Misuse of administrative controls in such a manner would shake the confidence of litigants upon the Court and fair administration of justice besides giving an impression of its partiality.
Allegations Against Family Court:
Both parties had leveled allegations against family court seized with the matter of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan. The High Court, with the consent of parties, transferred such cases to another family court. The wife sought transfer of case filed against her in Court' F' to Court at place L where her suit was pending adjudication urging female convenience and avoiding contradictory judgment. Contentions urged my wife were well based duly borne out from the appendices and also remained uncontroverted. For adjudication, the suit was transferred from the Court at place 'F to Court at place L.' Wife/applicant filed a lawsuit for recovery of maintenance allowance at the site "L." In contrast, the husband had filed suit for restitution of conjugal rights before Family Court at place "S."
Comments