Provision of Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan or Khula:
For the legal provisions or case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan you may contact Nazia Law Associates. The application was allowed in Circumstances. Nikah Nama and marriage registration certificate showed that patients were permanent residents of "P." Despite the husband's claim of permanent residence at K, the Petitioner had brought nothing on record to suggest. He had permanently settled at "K." to determine territorial jurisdiction of Family Court, Family Courts Act, 1964, and Family Courts Rules, 1965, were to be taken into account and not the provisions of S. 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. Section 5 & Shed. 1965 in case of a suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan or dower, allowed the wife to move the Court within the local limits of which she ordinarily resided.
Provison:
The second proviso to S. 7(2) of Family Courts Act, 1964 introduced, [in the year 2002], the concept of composite suit/objection by making the provision that plaint for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan could contain all claims. In the present case, the objection did not include the prayer for dissolution of marriage; however, proviso to R. 6 of Family Courts Rules, 1965 would come to rescue. The respondent ordinarily resided at "P," but both parties had their permanent residences at "P," where their marriage took place. The Family Court at "p" had jurisdiction to entertain, hear and adjudicate upon the respondent's suit for dower, etc., including custody of minors.
Khula Procedure in Pakistan:
For case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan the court noticed no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by the Family Court; a constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. Husband's (Petitioner) Application for return of sorrow of the wife on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction of the Family Court; was dismissed concurrently. Validity. In suits for dissolution of marriage or recovery of dower, jurisdiction vested in Court within the local limits of which the wife normally resided. In the present case, the wife resided at her maternal uncle's house due to apprehension of abduction at the husband's hands.
Version of the Life:
Such a version of the wife in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan was supported by evidence of her brother. Therefore, Family Court was fully competent to entertain the suit as the wife's residence did fall within its territorial jurisdiction. Suit for recovery of maintenance and territorial jurisdiction was decided by court. Parties were residing at place P. Suit was to be tried by the Family Court at place P. Cases were remanded to the Family Judge, at place "P" for decision afresh by law. The territorial jurisdiction of Family Court was decided first.
Husband Applied:
Husband applied R. 6 of Family Courts Rules, 1965, for objection return because the wife resided in another district. Trial Court returned the objection, and the appellate Court upheld the order of the Trial Court. The wife allegedly lived in another section, and she filed a suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan or khula procedure in Pakistan in the Family Court of the said District. Application of wife was maintainable under the Family Courts Rules, 1965.
Comments